Time after time, situation after situation, I encounter
people that “get things done.” They argue with a sense of certainty that they
are doing “the right thing for the situation,” as if there isn’t really any
right thing at all. These people are called pragmatists. They look at the
situation and determine what the right thing to do is based on what they
believe are the special circumstances of that situation. This person deserves a
break, this person needs a little help, this person could use a little extra
time for special circumstances. Personally, I can’t really find fault with such
lines of thinking. How can I fault the very thing that I do as well on a
regular basis? No. The problem I have is with closet pragmatists- the people who
at the same time they look at special circumstances they claim that they are
working within a set system of boundaries. Hypocrisy: that is the real issue.
How can people on the one hand say that they support the
Rule of Law and then with the same breath undermine the rule of Law by giving
special people a break?
In a country that believes in opportunity for all, how can politicians
go and create laws that benefit the few?
As Jews who pretend to care about right and wrong, emes and
sheker, how can we go about defending people who are most obviously guilty?
Either there is a standard, or there is no standard at all.
Once you start making exceptions to the rule, there is no rule at all.
Everything is exceptions. Once everything is exceptions, aren’t we all just
pragmatists?
(As always- Unproofed.)